<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Conde &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnconde.net/blog/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnconde.net/blog</link>
	<description>John Conde&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:54:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Site Traffic Is Not A Ranking Factor For Search Engines</title>
		<link>http://www.johnconde.net/blog/site-traffic-is-not-a-ranking-factor-for-search-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnconde.net/blog/site-traffic-is-not-a-ranking-factor-for-search-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Conde</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnconde.net/blog/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the many myths concerning how pages are ranked is that the volume of traffic a website receives affects the rankings of the pages within that website. On the surface this seems logical as a website that gets a &#8230; <a href="http://www.johnconde.net/blog/site-traffic-is-not-a-ranking-factor-for-search-engines/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnconde.net/blog/site-traffic-is-not-a-ranking-factor-for-search-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meta Tags Are Dead. Get Over It.</title>
		<link>http://www.johnconde.net/blog/meta-tags-are-dead-get-over-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnconde.net/blog/meta-tags-are-dead-get-over-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Conde</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnconde.net/blog/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; For the purpose of this blog post, when I say &#8220;Meta tags&#8221; I am referring to the Meta description and keyword tags only. &#160; Back in the day, when Alta Vista was king of search and Yahoo was primarily &#8230; <a href="http://www.johnconde.net/blog/meta-tags-are-dead-get-over-it/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnconde.net/blog/meta-tags-are-dead-get-over-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Authority Does Not Affect Your Rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.johnconde.net/blog/domain-authority-does-not-affect-your-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnconde.net/blog/domain-authority-does-not-affect-your-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Conde</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnconde.net/blog/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you who have been living under a rock, domain authority is a popular concept that claims that a domain name that has lots of pages, gets lots of visitors, has lots of links, and is frequently indexed &#8230; <a href="http://www.johnconde.net/blog/domain-authority-does-not-affect-your-rankings/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnconde.net/blog/domain-authority-does-not-affect-your-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Gets It Right With Paid Links</title>
		<link>http://www.johnconde.net/blog/google-gets-it-right-with-paid-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnconde.net/blog/google-gets-it-right-with-paid-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Conde</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnconde.net/blog/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Cutts again asked webmasters to report paid links to Google in his blog. And, as usual, webmasters whined and complained about how Google is asking webmasters to be snitches and that they are arrogant for asking webmasters to do &#8230; <a href="http://www.johnconde.net/blog/google-gets-it-right-with-paid-links/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnconde.net/blog/google-gets-it-right-with-paid-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

